Trust & Privacy

Will an AI-Drafted Report Still Sound Like Me?

· By Ian Vardy, CEO, Soma Health

Yes — because you keep your voice, your structure, your clinical reasoning, and your final sign-off. The software takes the mechanical assembly off your plate, not the thinking. You read every section and it's yours, or it doesn't go out.

Yes — because you keep your voice, your structure, your clinical reasoning, and your final sign-off. Soma takes the mechanical assembly off your plate, not the thinking. You read every section, you adjust what you want, and you sign it. If it doesn't sound like you, it doesn't go out the door.

I want to answer this one honestly, because it's the question I hear more than any other — and it's a fair worry.

A professional's hands typing on a laptop keyboard in warm light

Your voice, your structure, your final sign-off stay yours.

Will an AI-drafted report actually sound like me?

It will, and that's the whole point of building Soma the way we did. The psychologists I talk to don't want a generic template wearing their name. They want the report to read like theirs — same structure, same phrasing, same clinical judgment they'd bring on a good day with enough time.

So that's what we anchored everything to. Your report keeps your voice and your way of organizing things. The software's job is the slow, mechanical part — pulling the pieces together into a first draft you then shape. The thinking stays with you, every time.

One clinician told me their old notes were "knowledge for myself, not really what a note is supposed to be." That stuck with me. The goal was never to replace how you write. It was to get you to a finished version of your report faster, without losing the part that makes it yours.

Hands typing on a laptop with handwritten notes beside it on a desk

The software handles the assembly; you keep every clinical decision.

What does the software write, and what do I still write?

The software handles the assembly; you handle the judgment — and you have the final say on every word. Think of the draft as a strong starting point that already follows your structure, rather than a blank page you have to fill from nothing.

You're still the clinician. You decide what's clinically meaningful, what to emphasize, what to soften, what to cut. You review each section and edit anything that isn't right. Nothing leaves your hands until you've read it and you're satisfied it reads like your work.

For a lot of the people I speak with, a single assessment report is a 10-to-15-hour job — and the dread usually isn't the testing. It's the blank page afterward. The slow assembly of everything into prose. That's the part we wanted to take off your plate, so the time you spend is spent on the clinical thinking, not the typing.

Won't it read like generic AI?

That worry is the most common one I hear, and honestly, it's earned. We've all seen the flat, padded, say-nothing AI writing — and clinicians can smell it from a mile away. If a report read like that, it would be useless to you, and worse than useless to a reader who's trusting your name on the page.

So that's exactly what we built against. Soma isn't trying to write a report — it's trying to help you finish your report. Because it follows your structure and your phrasing, the draft doesn't start from some anonymous house style. It starts from yours.

And the safeguard is simple: you read it. The number-one fear I hear from clinicians about AI writing is that it'll come out generic and not sound like them. The review-and-sign step is there precisely so that fear never becomes reality. If a sentence sounds off, you change it before it's ever final. You're the filter, and nothing skips you.

I'd rather be straight with you than oversell it. The promise isn't "magic prose with one click." The promise is: a real first draft, in your shape, that you finish — far faster than starting cold. (More on whether faster reports still hold up, and on the report-writing problem this all comes from.)

Do I keep control of the clinical content?

Completely. Every clinical decision in the report is yours, and you sign every section. The software doesn't decide what's significant, doesn't form impressions, and doesn't get the last word — you do.

That matters to me for reasons beyond comfort. Soma is software that helps you draft your reports and notes. It is not a clinician, it doesn't practice, and it doesn't give care or advice. The judgment, the interpretation, the responsibility for what the report says — that all stays with you, where it belongs. We built the workflow so you're always the one reviewing and approving, never rubber-stamping something you didn't shape.

In practical terms: you look at each section, you keep what's right, you fix what isn't, and you decide when it's done. If something doesn't reflect your read of the situation, you change it. The report is yours start to finish — Soma just spares you the hours of mechanical writing in between.

There's good evidence the in-between is where the time goes. One survey of practising psychologists found a median of around five hours a week on non-billable clinical work like documentation — and just over half called that admin load a real source of work stress. That's the weight we're trying to lift, without ever touching your clinical voice.

An open notebook filled with handwriting beside a fountain pen on a wooden desk

However you write is yours to keep — that difference is the whole value.

What if my reporting style is unusual?

Then it stays unusual — in the best way. There's no single "correct" way to write a report, and we never tried to force one. Some clinicians write tight and clipped; some write rich and narrative; some have section orders and headings they've refined over years. All of that is yours to keep.

Soma is meant to follow your style, not flatten it into an average. If the way you write is a little different from the next clinician, that difference is the whole value — it's what makes the report read like you wrote it, because you did. Our job is to fit your way of working, not ask you to fit ours.

And if you ever look at a draft and think that's not how I'd say it — good. That's the moment you edit, and that's the moment it becomes fully yours. You can see how the reports side works whenever you're ready, no pressure either way.

So — will it sound like you?

It will, because you stay in the chair. You keep your voice, your structure, your reasoning, and the final signature on every section. Soma takes the mechanical assembly, not the thinking — and nothing goes out until you've read it and it reads like yours.

I won't pretend the worry isn't real. Generic AI writing exists, and clinicians are right to be allergic to it. We built Soma to be the opposite of that: a tool that gets you to a finished version of your own report sooner, without ever asking you to hand over the part that makes it yours. You can see how Soma drafts a report you review and sign.

Thank you for reading, and for the care you put into your work — it means a great deal to us. If you want to talk it through, I'd genuinely love to hear about your practice.

— Ian

Ian Vardy
Ian Vardy
Founder & CEO, Soma Health

Ian is building Soma — AI tools that give clinicians their time back by drafting documentation, so therapists and psychologists can focus on their clients. He writes about clinical reporting, AI, and running a clinician-first software company.

See how Soma drafts reports →